>i don't think you are. are you really here to be informed?
>this is all easy to access information.

this is a weird way to have a conversation.

i ask a question

you don't or half answer

i restate the question

you say "go find the answer yourself" and question if I really wanna have a conversation?

yeah, i *could* do that (in fact I did. see the conflicting links re: obama above)

then, since you chimed in I asked *YOU*

mea culpa I guess

*shrug*

>i addressed the things she's done that have voided good things
>the past administrations have done.

no. you really didn't

>all those things she UNDID
>were DONE by the obama administration's education department.
>they were good things.

you said

"i think previous administrations had people who were trying to make things better,"

based on what?

you said "even if they were misguided and forced by outside pressures into limiting their visions in favor of 'reforms' that are more about ego, efficiency and making money than students.

so them NOT makign things better is a win how now?

you say: "devos is literally that outside force that cars more about ego and making money than students. "

okay... i (again) stated that she is more of the same old thing

YOU just proved it


>she's anti science because she funds groups that undermine
>climate science and medical research.

as secretary of education or before?

SINCE she has been SOE, has she de-funded groups that push for those things?

(is this where you tell me go look it up for myself?)

>she made a statement about putting "America and American
>workers first," which has nothing to do with her job or her
>areas of expertise, and is only an area she cares about for
>reasons of $$$ and political posturing, after the president
>backed out of the Paris Climate Accords.

so she is yammering abd blabbering the party line

yes.

"bad touch" indeed.

but her saying that (by your own words) has nothing do do with her job so it doesn't move the needle related to education, does it?

>just think about that...she released an immediate (same day!)
>press statement about that move.

she is a puppet doing puppet things.

why you mad son?

IF/WHEN she does something that is actually detrimental to public education then get on her about it

but barking when the dog whistle blows makes you what exactly?

smarten up nas (c) Shawn c.

>she never released an
>official statement about WV's strike, and it took her 4 days
>to tweet about it (saying nothing of substance).

so she took too long to give you something to be mad about?

hanh?

what exactly could/should she have done about WV's strike in your opinion?

>she favors funding schools that don't teach evolution.

%^&*( what she "favors"

has she, from her seat as SOE funded any?
has she WITHDRAWN funding from schools that do?

what has been lost?