13. "Nah, fam, go back and read the transcript - a neurologists testified" In response to In response to 9 Thu Dec-18-14 07:42 PM by vee-lover
that she had her hands up when she was shot
And the evidence showed she HAD NO GUN RESIDUE ON HER HANDS OR ANY OF THE WEAPONS which alone should be grounds for a new trial
But a pardon as far as I'm concerned isn't out of the question
>Those are white people who committed crimes against property >and money. Not black folks accused of killing cops. > >We're talking about someone who was given due process (even if >you don't agree with the outcome), convicted and sentenced who >escaped from prison. There's no "new" evidence to exonerate >her, there's no way around the fact that she escaped from jail >and thus forfeited her right to appeal through the proper >channels. > >You can't say she should be pardoned because it would be a >nice thing to do, there has to be precedence and cover. >There's neither here. > > >my avy: Deep in your heart, you know he's right: >http://coreyrichardsonneedsajob.com/ >my hustle: http://SupaSoulSounds.com > >*RIP: John T. "220v" Richardson, Blessing Benson, and Dilla*