There's a response to this article (see below) from a guy responding to someone who said women don't need protection from men. Ugh, I wish I didn't know these mindsets existed...better yet, I wish these mindsets didn't exist:


@arfoire. Women definitely demand and currently enjoy a lot of protection. Police, subsidies, quotas, affirmative action, dirty/dangerous jobs (sewers, high voltage, underwater...)... The whole system caters to their this need and it does so by coercing men with intricate laws and extracting the necessary resources from them via taxes. Women are net beneficiaries of the whole tax system in place in each and every one of the Western Countries, while men are net contributors in it (1).

It is only natural, because women are weaker and must use protection from the state as a proxy for strength against malicious men. Saying women do not need protection is super naive and a problem with our society. Women are entitled and cared for to the point where they think everything surrounding them is free and a right. Many do not appreciate that the system has been created by men who worried about women. They still have the nerve to complain against the patriarchy today.

Now, is protection a "need" for women? We could argue that they can also pass without it, but they would surely get a rougher deal and face more difficulties in their everyday life. Therefore, it has been institutionalized women (people in general but specially women) need protection and that the state will provide that. Fine. Why not do the same with sex? Before, monogamy and religion would take care of it, but now that these institutions are down, society needs a new agent redistributing access to sex for the sake of equality and well-being of the whole population and specially men. Having no sex may not be a big deal for most women, but it is for most men given the greater pervasiveness of their desire to mate coming from having higher testosterone.

You say "you have no right to any other human beings time or body". Why are then women entitled to protection from the state? To water or freedom to walk the streets without fear? Who provides that? Mostly men do through taxes as we've seen. The state coerces men (people in general but mostly men) to sacrifice part of their will and wealth to sustain a system that mostly benefits women. This pretty much seems like women being entitled to the time and body of men, at least for the amount worth of taxes they pay. And specially because they have no choice on it.


(1) "Research finds that as a group, only men pay taxes" (Reddit).

Original Source: "The Distribution of Income and Fiscal Incidence by Age and Gender: Some Evidence from New Zealand" (2014).

Women say "My body my choice". Well, then why not "My company my choice" or "My money my choice" for men? Why do men have to pay taxes or make space for women in companies? The answer is that there is a general consensus stating that the particular interests of shareholders, managers and contributors will not be those of the general public. If left to their impulses, men will not contribute enough and companies will not provide equality. So the state intervenes and redistributes money and jobs in a more egalitarian way. Fine.

Why on earth, then though, do we trust women in their particular interest when deciding the allocation of sex? Shouldn't they be guided or controlled as men are to ensure that sex gets equally distributed? Women today choose who they have sex with, and they do so primarily (for the feelings) mainly with only a minority of men at the top of the hierarchy in terms of looks, height, status, money and shared origin; rejecting the majority of men for being too ugly, short, poor, low-status and/or other-race. Is this fair? I does not look like it. Hence why we need the state intervening in the sexual market to redistribute sex after the fall of monogamy.

No forcing women nor raping them. No. Just start by telling them what is wrong with acting on their impulses under complete freedom, and explain they need to share their love and touch with every man for the sake of social stability and general well-being. Pedagogy. If they do not do so and continue to be hypergamous, then intervene with the Promiscuity Tax. The tax will preserve freedom of choice, while incentivizing the desirable behaviors for the group at the same time. Money would be used to compensate incels for the discrimination they suffer, so they can attend the services of a professional (prostitution).

Noone would be raped nor forced in my scheme. At least not more than people are forced to pay taxes to sustain the system. Women have a responsibility with society and where they can help the most is in the sexual market, either by becoming partners and mothers, and/or sharing theirs goods with every man without discrimination. Hypergamy needs to be controlled for a healthy society as much as violence is.

____________