21. "No." In response to In response to 20 Wed Jul-12-17 05:51 PM by denny
It's not that they are insufficiently quantitative. It's that they are attacking the underlying value of quantitative analysis itself. There is more than enough literature that supports this. The anti-intellectual shift from quantitative to qualitative analysis is shown by the emergence of 'autoethnographical' method. Look it up. It's literally everywhere now. Within what? 15 years? The past 5 years and EVERY humanities student is doing autoethnography for their PHD? WHAT?
It's essentially a diary entry because 'intellectual discourse' itself is a tool to maintain patriarchy, white supremacy and penises going into vaginas. Numbers are racist sexist lgbtphobic. Data analysis is the tool of straight white men. Dialectic discourse is sanctioned violence.