> "I argue that “cultural appropriation” is never merely
>the appropriation of culture, but also of gender, sexuality,
>class, etc."
>
>Let's discuss. This is an assertion that all incidents of
>cultural appropriation are intersectional. More
>specifically...they are NEVER exclusively about race to the
>exclusion of any and all other forms of oppression. Fair
>reading or no?

I'm not going to waste my time reading it, but I'm pretty sure the author made their case to support their argument. Doesn't mean you have to agree with the conclusions. I bet a lot of people in the field disagree with the theory proposed in the article.


So what? That's the way academics work. If the work is interesting enough, someone will write an opposing piece with a different take on things and their own supporting evidence.

So just like the last time you did this, you continue to be outraged by stuff you don't understand

_______________________________________