Noone is being misquoted. Their abstracts are being linked. If they felt secure and proud of their work why would this be an issue?

There's been an argument made that goes something like 'It's not fair to link these abstracts to those outside of that particular field to the general public'. This is hilariously similar to those who practice scientology and their claims that the media misrepresents them.

'Of course it sounds ridiculous to the general public. They haven't learned all of our presuppositions and re-definitions yet'. This is a pretty good sign one has been indoctrinated in a dogma. Also, referring to those that haven't 'heard the good news' as mouth-breathing semi-illiterates is ALSO a good sign you've been indoctrinated in dogma.

BTW...the people behind reel peer review are a collection of mostly non-white, non-american STEM TA's and professors. Not that it should matter...but it certainly does in the world they are critiquing.

Here is a good example:

https://youtu.be/kasiov0ytEc?t=635