because that was the intent of the UN
and the security council is largely encumbered in its actions by the 5 permanent members -
so this would mean at the very least doing away of the veto powers
actually, why does this still exist? for example, there will never be recognition of the palestinian state, even if a majority of countries believe it should have statehood (because america)
there has been no resolution of syria (either russia or china has vetoed)
there was the ukraine issue (china vetoing sanctions on russia, and russia being a permanent member)

but not sure if this still answers the question
say, should this reorganized entity call for military (or other) intervention in a particular country
would the united states then commit its military?


i think there is (instead) perhaps be a need for an international peacekeeping force
kinda like what we have at the moment, but a permanent force with contributions from different countries....
unlike now which is mission-based

.
http://perspectivesudans.blogspot.com/
i myself would never want to be god,or even like god.Because god got all these human beings on this planet and i most certainly would not want to be responsible for them, or even have the disgrace that i made them.