Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #33408

Subject: "counterpoint" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
bshelly
Charter member
71730 posts
Sun Dec-18-05 01:27 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
56. "counterpoint"
In response to In response to 0


  

          

http://www.citypaper.net/articles/2005-12-15/movies3.shtml

Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts) is a good girl. At the start of Peter Jackson's King Kong, she's surviving the Depression in New York City by juggling and cartwheeling on a vaudeville stage. Pale and scrappy, she's only briefly defeated when the theater closes its doors, leaving her and her troupe mates on the street with nowhere to go and no money for food. She spends only a moment looking in the window of a burlesque house, then turns away, determined to maintain her goodness rather than sell herself cheap.

It's at this moment, as Ann walks wearily from the burlesque joint and is caught trying to steal an apple, that she meets film director Carl Denham (Jack Black). More precisely, he descends on her, bailing her out, then treating her to a full-on meal. Though she's famished, she's righteously skeptical at first, and well she should be. The showman Denham is a schemer and opportunist, recently threatened with shutdown by his wary producers (who think him "a preening self-promoter") and in search of a new leading lady for his current project. (He can't get "Fay," who's making a picture with "Cooper"—name-drops demonstrating Jackson's affection for his source and inspiration.)

In fact, it's the relationship between original and remake that's most interesting about this newest Kong, following John Guillermin's 1976 effort. Jackson's incarnation certainly takes up the original's examination of the excesses and vagaries of show business, most plainly embodied by the cynical, devious and strangely self-knowing Denham. His excursion is grandly delusional, as he tricks playwright Jack Driscoll (Adrien Brody) into coming along to finish a script (and fall in love with Ann) and finagles stern Captain Englehorn (Thomas Kretschmann) into persisting until they literally crash into Skull Island.

Still, as calamitously egotistical and jackblacky as Denham may be, he's not so different from his namesake (memorably played in 1933 by Robert Armstrong). What actually sets the new movie apart from its predecessor is its characterization of Ann, and specifically her relationship to Kong. Taking a page from Mighty Joe Young, this Kong has Ann come to sympathize and even fall a bit in love with her gigantic captor. And she's not alone: As played by Andy Serkis in another stunning motion-capture performance, the gorilla is part playful child, part ferocious he-man and part responsible adult, all devoted to the golden-haired "beauty" to whom Denham attributes his demise.

But it's not beauty that kills the beast. It's greed, meanness and lack of vision that destroy Kong's "nature" and "wildness," his emblematic manhood—indeed, his darkness. As many viewers have pointed out, the 1933 film is pervaded by disturbing racism in its depictions of the Skull Island natives, extended to the fearful specter Kong provides in relation to the perfect white woman Ann. Jackson's film—co-written with his usual collaborators, Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens—makes Ann's admiration for Kong an earnest distraction from her eventual, proper coupledom with Jack (who, even with Brody's Men's Health coverboy abs, can't compete with the potent spectacle of Kong).

Ann's scrappy nature allows her not only to scamper through jungles and over mountains (with minimal screaming), but also to see (with her gigantic blue eyes, in frequent close-up) into Kong's desires, deliberations and devices. She soon realizes that he means to save her from dinosaurs (which look terrific as long as they're not in the same frame with human actors, whereupon they suddenly look quite 2D), giant bats and men, rather than rip her "limb from limb," as he has apparently done to other tribal sacrifice victims. At this point, unlike the Wray version, she aligns herself with Kong, increasingly horrified by Denham's plans to capture, chain and display him.

Still, Ann's evolving affection for Kong (her first efforts to appease him, dancing and juggling as she did onstage, are bizarrely charming) is quite different from the worship acted out by the natives who kidnap and sacrifice her to him. The adventurers' first contact with the island natives and the ritual sacrifice scene make the black primitives as "other" as they can be—captured in nightmarish stop-go pans and blurs.

In this context, the blackness of the ship's courageous and sensible first mate, Hayes (Evan Parke), seems something of a pre-emptive casting decision to allay accusations of racism, but he is undeniably charismatic; he even saves the overeager Jimmy (Jamie Bell). By the time this vision is remade in Denham's stage show, the blackface performers are overtly offensive, illustrating the film's acute awareness of the problem, if not quite a resolution. It's Ann and Kong's romance that drives the film and at least begins to address complex race dynamics. At once sensational and heartrending, it's a romance that can't possibly be.

----
bshelly

"You (Fisher) could get fired, Les Snead could get fired, Kevin Demoff could get fired, but I will always be Eric Dickerson.ā€¯ (c) The God

  

Printer-friendly copy


Let's discuss subliminal racism = Peter Jackson's work. [View all] , AquamansWrath, Fri Dec-16-05 02:04 PM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
RE: Let's discuss subliminal racism = Peter Jackson's work.
Dec 16th 2005
1
I've been telling all my friends the LOTR series is racist as hell
Dec 16th 2005
2
RE: I've been telling all my friends the LOTR series is racist as hell
Dec 16th 2005
3
Yup it is.. .and exactly on point.
Dec 16th 2005
16
i'm not buying your take on LOTR
Dec 16th 2005
4
so you just argued and supported my post in one statement
Dec 16th 2005
17
when did i say it was *NOT* racist?
Dec 16th 2005
24
RE: i'm not buying your take on LOTR
Dec 17th 2005
30
      oh, there's nothing accidental about it.
Dec 17th 2005
35
it is, but your breakdown is completely wrong
Dec 16th 2005
8
i think this is true:
Dec 16th 2005
14
RE: i think this is true:
Dec 16th 2005
15
RE: it is, but your breakdown is completely wrong
Jan 05th 2006
178
RE: it is, but your breakdown is completely wrong
Jun 06th 2006
207
RE: I've been telling all my friends the LOTR series is racist as hell
Dec 18th 2005
49
hmm, didn't notice this post. there's so many mistakes though
Dec 21st 2005
139
you're absolutely right, but...
Dec 21st 2005
140
      other people might read the replies though
Dec 21st 2005
142
      yet your here... you read it... and you keep posting...
Dec 21st 2005
143
           AGENDAS...
Dec 27th 2005
162
                Not to mention it borders Aryan mythology which could easily
Jun 06th 2006
209
If I was a racist
May 26th 2006
196
to be fair to Peter Jackson...
Dec 16th 2005
5
I've seen both of the earlier versions
Dec 16th 2005
6
sounds pretty bad.
Dec 16th 2005
11
RE: I've seen both of the earlier versions
May 25th 2006
184
Um. No.
Dec 16th 2005
18
well...
Dec 16th 2005
25
I can't take Peter Jackson seriously as a filmmaker
Dec 17th 2005
31
I can't take him seriously as a non-biggot either
Dec 17th 2005
32
some issues with this...
Dec 17th 2005
36
RE: some issues with this...
Dec 17th 2005
39
then you didn't read the books
Dec 17th 2005
44
ah come on...
Dec 18th 2005
58
lol.. you seriously expect them to make LOTR a discourse on racism?
Dec 18th 2005
59
No, it wasn't faithful at all!!!
May 26th 2006
197
Check out this article
Dec 16th 2005
7
This is great!
Dec 16th 2005
13
RE: This is great!
Dec 16th 2005
22
Great article!
Dec 22nd 2005
156
Myth & Symbology: Constructed Meaning
Dec 16th 2005
9
oh dear god
Dec 16th 2005
12
      as if he would admit that and ruin his career?????? c'mon now...
Dec 16th 2005
19
      dude he saw the movie when he was like 7 years old
Dec 16th 2005
20
      Your missing the point... and he's not 7 NOW.
Dec 16th 2005
21
           no you're missing the point: he's NOT making the movie to promote racism
Dec 16th 2005
23
      RE: as if he would admit that and ruin his career?????? c'mon now...
Dec 16th 2005
28
           RE: as if he would admit that and ruin his career?????? c'mon now...
Dec 17th 2005
33
           wow....
Dec 17th 2005
41
           Did your teacher own a map?
Dec 17th 2005
42
           are you really prepared to take it there?
Dec 18th 2005
63
                no one is claiming that the Empire St Building wasnt a huge penis.
Dec 19th 2005
65
                     fuck that... Egyptians were black...
Dec 19th 2005
69
                     like I said, you are a fucking hypocrite
Dec 19th 2005
78
                          truth must hurt...
Dec 19th 2005
79
                          yep, he's a racist and a hypocrite
May 26th 2006
195
                     There's actually some good points here
May 31st 2006
205
                          Um, actually it's the continuation and promotion of such
Jun 01st 2006
206
      RE: oh dear god
Dec 17th 2005
34
           You're part of the problem?
May 26th 2006
189
do you know why he remade King Kong?
Dec 16th 2005
10
it's all about the melanin
Dec 16th 2005
26
Why is the only good orc a dead orc? (Swipe)
Dec 16th 2005
27
Very good read
Dec 16th 2005
29
THANK YOU for this
Dec 17th 2005
37
Interesting...
Dec 17th 2005
38
      Good points..
Dec 17th 2005
40
      'you can't separate?'
Dec 17th 2005
43
      This is going way too far...
Dec 18th 2005
46
           This is not about prejudice
Dec 18th 2005
47
                So shouldn't your outrage be directed at Universal Studios?
Dec 18th 2005
51
                     I never attacked Jackson
Dec 18th 2005
54
Why pick on Peter Jackson?
Dec 18th 2005
45
RE: Why pick on Peter Jackson?
Dec 18th 2005
48
      We're gonna have to agree to disagree....
Dec 18th 2005
50
           ???
Dec 18th 2005
53
                I see no cop-out...
Dec 18th 2005
57
                     Popular Art and Racism
Dec 18th 2005
60
RE: Let's discuss subliminal racism = Peter Jackson's work.
Dec 18th 2005
52
This post is fucking moronic at best...
Dec 18th 2005
55
Really?
Dec 18th 2005
61
Basically.
Dec 18th 2005
62
Nettrice..I am not saying that there isnt racism in the King Kong film
Dec 19th 2005
66
      You know you don't have to participate?
Dec 19th 2005
70
           listen douchebag
Dec 19th 2005
80
                again... you don't have to participate...
Dec 19th 2005
87
                     amazing how you cannot grasp the simplist of concepts...
Dec 19th 2005
88
It's not moronic in an ontological sense
May 26th 2006
198
RE: counterpoint
Dec 18th 2005
64
      If the woman in the movie were black...
Dec 27th 2005
164
           RE: If the woman in the movie were black...
Dec 27th 2005
165
Simple question...
Dec 19th 2005
67
RE: Simple question...
Dec 19th 2005
68
Exactly. To even use those two examples...
Dec 19th 2005
71
RE: Simple question...
Dec 19th 2005
82
      actually bright spot the title says Peter Jackson's WORK...
Dec 19th 2005
85
some dumb ass questions...
Dec 19th 2005
72
      Your & You're
Dec 19th 2005
81
           okay let me try...
Dec 19th 2005
86
                RE: okay let me try...
Dec 19th 2005
90
RE: Let's discuss subliminal racism = Peter Jackson's work.
Dec 19th 2005
73
it's called liberal racism... let's discuss your 'hippie geek'
Dec 19th 2005
74
      Real Talk
Dec 31st 2005
171
           RE: Real Talk
Jan 06th 2006
180
RE: Let's discuss subliminal racism = Peter Jackson's work.
Dec 19th 2005
75
Hmmm... that was straight stupid...
Dec 19th 2005
76
      my point is why would it take that for you to get it?
Dec 19th 2005
77
      Peter Jackson is a Kiwi....
Dec 19th 2005
83
           so what your saying is...
Dec 19th 2005
84
                RE: so what your saying is...
Dec 19th 2005
89
                actually that's not what I'm saying at all...
Dec 19th 2005
92
                That was my entire point:
Dec 19th 2005
93
                     What? It's a topic... not a movement...
Dec 19th 2005
95
                          wow, you have no problem making shit up post after post after post
Dec 19th 2005
96
                               In My Head?!?!?! HAHAHAHAHAHAHa...
Dec 19th 2005
97
                                    RE: In My Head?!?!?! HAHAHAHAHAHAHa...
Dec 19th 2005
98
                                         uh no. You are.
Dec 19th 2005
99
                where did I say he was a brilliant film maker or person?
Dec 19th 2005
91
                     Actually you said he was a Kiwi
Dec 19th 2005
94
                          So you admit that I said he was a kiwi....
Dec 19th 2005
100
                               ayo what the fuck is your problem?
Dec 19th 2005
101
      RE: Hmmm... that was straight stupid...
Dec 20th 2005
128
RE: Who is Peter Jackson?-n/m
Dec 19th 2005
102
RE: Who is Peter Jackson?-n/m
Dec 19th 2005
103
Beyond Black and White: Postmodernism and Race in LOTR (swipe, long...)
Dec 19th 2005
104
Interesting
Dec 20th 2005
106
i think it's pure coincidence he happens to take on these epics
Dec 20th 2005
105
since when do white men think of black men as sexually insecure?
Dec 20th 2005
107
Um, your reading it wrong Jon...
Dec 20th 2005
108
here is the real question
Dec 20th 2005
109
Who is the moron?
Dec 20th 2005
110
Exactly.
Dec 20th 2005
112
what for?
Dec 20th 2005
113
      do we?
Dec 20th 2005
115
      RE: do we?
Dec 20th 2005
117
           No one seems to go any further? You didn't read a damn thing..
Dec 20th 2005
119
                RE: No one seems to go any further? You didn't read a damn thing..
Dec 20th 2005
122
                     Um... actually genius... that wasn't the point of this post...
Dec 20th 2005
124
                     my point is you have no point
Dec 20th 2005
135
                          um, again... HIS WORK IS RACIST...
Dec 20th 2005
136
                               you are being obtuse
Dec 20th 2005
137
                               thanks for the observation. Everyone appreciates it.
Dec 20th 2005
138
                               Let me correct you
May 26th 2006
192
                                    RE: Let me correct you
May 26th 2006
199
                                         Wow... I posted this months ago
May 26th 2006
200
                                              Of course
May 26th 2006
201
                                                   RE: Of course
Jun 06th 2006
208
                     Actually there are studies
Dec 20th 2005
125
      RE: what for?
Dec 20th 2005
126
           trust me love... you have more than explained yourself
Dec 20th 2005
127
hey brightspot... read the title... "Peter Jackson's WORK" so...
Dec 20th 2005
111
RE: hey brightspot... read the title... "Peter Jackson's WORK" so...
Dec 20th 2005
114
      No I completely understood it... your the easy part...
Dec 20th 2005
116
           RE: No I completely understood it... your the easy part...
Dec 20th 2005
118
                Your too self righteous... and you didn't read a ounce of this post
Dec 20th 2005
120
                     RE: Your too self righteous... and you didn't read a ounce of this post
Dec 20th 2005
121
                          haha.. asshat...
Dec 20th 2005
123
Autonomy vs. heteronomy
May 26th 2006
191
what the hell happened in this post?
Dec 20th 2005
129
please... there are some great responses in this post...
Dec 20th 2005
130
      yes, there are... but they are obscured by all your bickering
Dec 20th 2005
131
           right... just me and me alone... wasn't provoked at all...sure.
Dec 20th 2005
132
                last response
Dec 20th 2005
133
                     nice of you to pick up on that after the fact... baiting people?
Dec 20th 2005
134
angel cake vs. devil's food
Dec 21st 2005
141
RE: angel cake vs. devil's food
Dec 22nd 2005
144
      stands up and applauds...
Dec 22nd 2005
145
      look at your bullshit reasoning
Dec 22nd 2005
146
           here's why YOUR Bullshit...
Dec 22nd 2005
147
           your reasoning boils down to this:
Dec 22nd 2005
153
           RE: look at your bullshit reasoning
Dec 22nd 2005
149
      RE: angel cake vs. devil's food
Dec 22nd 2005
148
           RE: angel cake vs. devil's food
Dec 22nd 2005
150
           RE: angel cake vs. devil's food
Dec 22nd 2005
155
           RE: angel cake vs. devil's food
Dec 22nd 2005
151
                RE: angel cake vs. devil's food
Dec 22nd 2005
152
                i said 'right wing' as a catchall for all the bad ideologies
Dec 22nd 2005
154
No your wrong
Dec 23rd 2005
157
RE: No your wrong
Dec 24th 2005
158
RE: No your wrong
Dec 24th 2005
159
RE: No your wrong
Dec 24th 2005
160
      RE: No your wrong
Dec 24th 2005
161
           RE: No your wrong
Dec 27th 2005
163
                RE: No your wrong
Dec 27th 2005
166
                     looking for racism
Dec 27th 2005
167
                     Right here
Dec 28th 2005
168
                          RE: Right here
Dec 28th 2005
169
                          Analyze the special effects
May 26th 2006
194
Exactly and you know what's funny...
Jan 04th 2006
177
fantastic response
May 26th 2006
193
in the Chronic(WHAT?)cles of Narnia,evil is personified by a WHITE Witch
Dec 30th 2005
170
Narnia is not American
Jan 05th 2006
179
The original king kong was somewhat of a protest against racism--
Dec 31st 2005
172
thanks.
Jan 01st 2006
173
I mostly agree with this
Jan 01st 2006
174
LOTR doesn't portray people of colosur
Jan 01st 2006
176
And Eric Blair
May 25th 2006
188
*vomits*
May 26th 2006
190
RE: Let's discuss subliminal racism = Peter Jackson's work.
Jan 01st 2006
175
actually me and many scholars are saying it...
Jan 06th 2006
181
archive
May 25th 2006
182
I'll agree with you on this one
May 25th 2006
183
ROTFLMAO!! Reminescent of "Revolutionary thoughts inside" post.
May 25th 2006
185
I saw this coming a mile away
May 25th 2006
186
Every once in a while something like this pops up
May 25th 2006
187
RE:
May 31st 2006
202
      RE:
May 31st 2006
203
      which is my point... King Kong only adds to the problem...
May 31st 2006
204
LOTR and Kong are completely different. LOTR is steeped in
Jun 07th 2006
210
remember this?
Jun 09th 2006
211
      The Master Culture or canon
Jun 09th 2006
212
           great points... but we went through this before...
Jun 09th 2006
213
                RE: great points... but we went through this before...
Jun 09th 2006
214
                     but isn't that optimism at it's finest... and not completely realistic?
Jun 09th 2006
215

Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #33408 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com