Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby High-Tech topic #43172

Subject: "RE: Surely that would be mainly if you were doing a significant" Previous topic | Next topic
ilovelovelyone
Member since Mar 14th 2005
119 posts
Mon Nov-28-05 03:57 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
9. "RE: Surely that would be mainly if you were doing a significant"
In response to In response to 8


          

I thought the normalizing might be a bad idea. Why they invent that normalizing stuff anyway? I have still yet to see.

Thanks for the tips. I have been workin on stereo imaging. I have been trying to include as much in the mix as possible, using imaging on all individual tracks (panning doubled parts and putting autopan, chorus, or delay, etc.). Sometimes even the S1 imager, although not entirely sure I am doing it correctly. Stereospread?

Good lookin out on the limiter too. I'd been playin with that.

Nice site by the way.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote


Mastering & Plug-ins [View all] , ilovelovelyone, Mon Nov-28-05 10:53 AM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
It's only to be avoided if you can't detach yourself enough from
Nov 28th 2005
1
Thanks . . .
Nov 28th 2005
2
      You could run a couple of compressions at once
Nov 28th 2005
3
           RE: You could run a couple of compressions at once
Nov 28th 2005
6
                Final tape mastering should be pretty subtle IMO
Nov 28th 2005
7
RE: Mastering & Plug-ins
Nov 28th 2005
4
Surely that would be mainly if you were doing a significant
Nov 28th 2005
5
      RE: Surely that would be mainly if you were doing a significant
Nov 28th 2005
8
          
                you're welcome + thanks n/m.
Nov 28th 2005
10
                Heh...stereo panning is beyond cool
Nov 28th 2005
11

Lobby High-Tech topic #43172 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com