Please explain what relevance this had to anything. If it wasn't relevant, why do you think Rose's team tried it?

Even if you genuinely believe in your heart of hearts that this woman is an evil succubus trying to steal Poor Derrick's money (not even saying you do, but if you did,) isn't this still a shitty thing to do? Because the implication of it is consent isn't something that can ever be withdrawn, unless you're the right kind of victim.

That was of course, after they got TMZ to report that she was "mad over a sex toy."

Even if he's innocent, this is a gigantic piece of shit move.

https://theundefeated.com/whhw/derrick-rose-and-friends-cleared-of-gang-rape-charges-in-los-angeles/

“Of special note, plaintiff is publicly portraying herself as sexual,” lawyers argued in pretrial meetings. “The production includes photos from plaintiff’s Instagram account that are sexual in nature. In these images, plaintiff is dressed in provocative attire, is in sexually suggestive poses and is in photographs indicating that she engages in sexually charged encounters with more than one man at a time. Plaintiff’s use of Twitter and other forms of social media further belies her apparent desire for anonymity.”