I think I want a heel Shield. Ambrose, Reigns, and...eventually, Rollins. Or the Usos. Either way. They spend the fall beating Strowman in the shadiest ways possible to keep Roman as champ.

But I don’t trust WWE to execute it well enough for the crowd to not cheer it like crazy so I assume we get Heyman shenanigans where he aligns with Reigns and then the heeling will happen. And it will be fun. And Strowman will still be getting beat in the shadiest ways possible to ensure that Roman stays heel.

>Now I know this is giving them a lot of benefit of the doubt -
>there's really no evidence to think they're qualified to pull
>something like this off anymore. But I think the stars may
>actually be aligning for a Lesnar exit/Reigns turn/Strowman
>cash in at Summerslam
>
>- Brock seems to have one foot out the door, and they
>wouldn't book this match a FOURTH time to have Reigns come up
>short AGAIN would they? The one certainty is that he's
>definitely and finally beating Lesnar at Summerslam.
>
>- But they also couldn't possibly expect Reigns to be received
>well at the end of their 2nd biggest show of the year in
>Brooklyn of all places could they? Surely, as dumb as they
>are, they know how a whitebread babyface win by Reigns will
>go.
>
>- Watch this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSzvxxUnjgI
>Heyman's "unless..." is worth paying attention to
>
>- Why give the MITB briefcase to a babyface? To put a bow on
>Summerslam and not have it turn out a total disaster. Heyman
>turns on Lesnar, Reigns cheats to win, Strowman cashes
>in...and that works because a babyface can't cash in fairly
>otherwise. They're even trying to tease that Strowman is going
>to lose the briefcase to lead you another way.
>
>
>Am I giving these bozos way too much credit?
>
>
>
>