I mean that.

Logic like yours is awful and dangerous. And the fact
that you're couching it under "I'm just making conversation"
is the real problem.

Don't care what race you are, but you prolly unconsciously
hate black people. (if you black, that makes it worse)

This "even though the evidence says he's not guilty, he MIGHT
have still done it because of excuse X, Y, Z" is one of the
most pervasive symptoms of the broken ass criminal justice
system. It's been well-documented, and it isn't my opinion.

You JUST did it:

The evidence was laid out for you as to exactly how
a black man was completely innocent. You IMMEDIATELY
invoked "B-B-B-But he still coulda done it!"

That is racist. Sorry.

>to offer a different perspective for the sake of
>conversation/bullshittin/whatever.
>
>I don't know either party to be THAT invested in their
>situation.

But you fucked up, because while you don't KNOW either party,
you do KNOW that the girl admitted to lying. You do KNOW
that there is a direct paper trail as to how she benefited
from the lying and manipulation.

Instead of just reading and digesting the facts, you copped
pleas for the black man still possibly being guilty.