2642831, Yes. And you only have to pay them for a year at a time.
Posted by Cold Truth, Fri Feb-09-18 03:22 PM
>Maybe KCP will stay around for a year or 2 at $60M per...LOL
Oh em gee, lulz!!
Yes, we'd have to pay someone something to meet the cap floor. And?
>SMH...this is the same board that's been clowning the process
Tell us more about the price of tea I. China, and how tanking has so much to do with creating cap space while you have a team steadily improving on its prior years win totals.
>FYI, this is year 5 of the LAL's rebuild...just sayin
Yeah, Just sayin, because that's immaterial to where we are *today* with the players and management we have *now*.
>But since we're making conclusions based on assumptions and
>possibilities...
Literally the only conclusion being made is based on actual, inarguable and readily observae facts: were in a better position today then we were before the trade to take advantage of opportunities going forward. Thats it. Thats the "conclusion" you're going so hard at.
>what if CLE wins the chip with JC and Nance, and Bron
>stays...
>
>is that still a W for the LAL?
Yes, because the Lakers regaining financial flexibility was, is and will always be necessary regardless of who may or may not sign.
|