>Mitchell so not sure why you expect anyone to take your
>opinions remotely serious when it involves a Duke agenda.

I liked Kennard more coming into the draft, as did many. Mitchell is having a better season. I said it just now if I haven’t before. Is that a comment no one should take serious too?

>Tatum is absolutely great at what he does, but he's not asked
>to do all things that Simmons does.

I agree. (Kennard is not asked to do the things Mitchell is asked to do either. Wouldn’t you agree? Or is that just my Duke bias making me wrong for thinking that’s true?)

Also, Simmons has plenty
>of time to develop into an elite player.

I agree.

His ceiling is
>higher.

I agree.

And while he has a glaring weakness, he's still highly
>productive and impacting the game in a variety of ways.

I agree. Should all of your comments that I never disagreed with be discounted because I agree with them?