2634247, i obviously am completely biased Posted by thejerseytornado, Sun Dec-17-17 07:29 PM
but the whole completing the process of going to the ground thing has been a part of all catches for years. it looked like a catch, but that was an easy replay overturn as the rule stands.
and if it had been deemed a catch, the other (less than, cuz y'all hate the pats) half of the fans watching the game would have been livid because dude clearly dropped the pass.
edit: in other words, the "catch/not-a-catch" problem is a problem regardless of the specific rule. there is no rule that could exist that wouldn't have that problem.
----------- you think we playing chess, but i'm playing mad-making. Basaglia
|