Go back to previous topic
Forum nameOkay Sports
Topic subjectbut Washington didn't lose to Pitt. They lost to USC.
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=8&topic_id=2580299&mesg_id=2580527
2580527, but Washington didn't lose to Pitt. They lost to USC.
Posted by PROMO, Mon Dec-05-16 11:19 AM
also, why are you defining the Pac-12 title game as the ONLY quality win?

they beat Stanford who was Top 10. They beat Utah who was a top 20 team. They beat WSU who was ranked and who was lighting up EVERYONE at the time, and then they dragged the #8 team in the country for the Conf. Title.

why are people acting like the Big Ten is a bunch of world beaters? it's very much like the Pac-12: about four good teams near the top and then a bunch of scrubs. if UW actually showed up for the USC game, they'd be 13-0 and #2 with a bullet because USC isn't better than UW (they may be in the future, but not right today).

i mean, people can talk about quality wins all they want but that pretty much just means they haven't really seen UW play. We were tied for the most offensive TDs in CFB and we're 10th in defense.

i'd put a wager that UW would smoke Ohio St., Michigan, Wisconsin AND Penn St. if they played. UW's defense is on par w/ any Big Ten defense, but there's no offense in the Big Ten with the playmakers UW has.

so, * yeezy shrug *