2496824, agreed. I don't even see it as a risk. Posted by pretentious username, Mon Nov-23-15 10:57 AM
smarks love booing him, marks and kids like him but aren't as crazy about him as Cena, and the company needs a big heel more than it needs a big face. It's much easier to get away with not talking as a heel than a face. You really gonna rely on Sheamus as your top heel, even for a month or two?
>If Reigns sells out, he could state his case from a pragmatic >and vulnerable place - he was so close at Wrestlemania, it ate >him alive all year long, and he wasn't going to pass up the >opportunity to become champion again. Simple as that, he went >with a guarantee.
I'm willing to hold out hope that this is the long-term plan, but probably not. Either way, I think that's what they should go with.
> >I just think mostly through no fault of his own that Reigns is >pretty uninteresting. Ambrose is also not my cup of tea. >Turning Roman Reigns heel could've made both him and Ambrose a >lot more intriguing. >
co-sign. it's so simple, but apparently it makes too much sense.
|