>but they have a solid, seasoned veteran team. at this point
>that gives them the edge over a young albeit talented UCLA
>squad.
>
>
>>over the last few years that got their recruiting class
>>ranked high... seen them cats play in person multiple
>>times.... Iman Marshall....Adoree Jackson...Darius Rogers....
>
>
>
>>I got WRs who were 10th graders last year who torched
>Marshall
>>on a few plays.... seen guys touch up Adoree pretty solid
>>too..
>>
>>it's interesting how if a guy is on USC's radar...all of the
>>sudden they a 5 star recruit....
>
>yea recruiting services are always on that bullshit. s
>
>>Max Browne was the top QB coming out his year...and again
>was
>>the reason SC had a top recruiting class... has Max even
>seen
>>the field in a real game yet?
>
>Cody Kessler is a fine quarterback. WHy would they play Max
>Browne?


my point is that SC gets rated at the top of the recruiting classes because Max was the #1 guy coming out..yet he can't get on the field.... so what does that #1 recruiting class really mean?? nothing.




>
>
>>all those young defensive guys who were under Kiffin over
>>there..some who came out early...highly touted...cats didn't
>>even get drafted some of em.....
>
>you can still be a good college player and not get drafted.
>
>
>>meanwhile the Bruins pick up guys that come in and actually
>>ball when given the opportunity.... Barr??? Kendricks???
>Now
>>Myles Jack???
>>
>>come on man...
>
>
>theyre fine players, never said otherwise.
>
>
>>there's a talent disparity right now and that's why UCLA
>>smacks SC in the mouth when they play them...
>>
>>http://s3.amazonaws.com/br-cdn/temp_images/2013/12/01/2013-11-3017_37_01.gif
>
>
>smacked*..past tense. i think usc oregon and asu will contend
>for the pac 12 this year.
>
>this thread will be fun to up in late november.
>