2407070, LOL. Wrong. You said "objectively." That's stupid. Posted by Orbit_Established, Mon Jan-05-15 03:23 PM
Computer don't coach for a reason, because there are things that only a coach can decide and many great coaching decisions are not "objective."
(whatever the fuck "objective" means, which is another conversation. "Objective" is only as "objective" as the variables you consider)
Tom Coughlin playing his starters in the last game of the season 2007 vs. the undefeated Patriots was a stupid decision "objectively," because it had zero playoff implications (both teams were locked) and Coughlin risked getting a key player hurt when, unlike the Patriots, the Giants had to PLAY a WILD CARD GAME the next week.
He did it because wasn't about to let the Pats have that undefeated season without a fight...that's not "objective." That's male stupidity mathematically, a genius coaching subjectively.
What happens? The Giants gave the Pats their toughest game of the season (losing 38-35), and the Giants said this is why they weren't intimidated, at all, during the Superbowl and already knew how to play them. It worked
He put the game in his excellent defense's hands.
Shit didn't work out that way.
It was a fine way.
----------------------------
O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"
"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."
(C)Keith Murray, "
|