2250978, obviously they're better w/him but the fact that they played very
Posted by vee-lover, Thu Oct-24-13 01:15 PM
w/o him in the 2011-12 season goes to show he wasn't really the MVP of the *league* - maybe the Bulls MVP but the league's MOST VALUABLE PLAYER.
http://espn.go.com/espn/commentary/story/_/page/granderson-120406/chicago-bulls-2012-success-
>Rose played 39 of 66 games (roughly 60%)
>
>Games played WITH Rose 32-7 (82% winning)
>Games played WITHOUT Rose 18-9 (66% winning)
A 66% winning pct. w/o the "mvp" proves my point lol
>
>And a LOT of the teams they beat without him were ass (CHA 3x,
>Tor 2x, Wash, Det, Sac, NJ, Orl <--10 of those 18 wins).
and as the article pointed out, some of those wins were against top teams...like the Heat and the Celtics
>
>He makes a big difference. Let's not miminize it to make a
>point.
>
>
|