Go back to previous topic
Forum nameOkay Sports
Topic subjectGerald Wallace making 10 million a year isn't that bad.
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=8&topic_id=2203011&mesg_id=2203581
2203581, Gerald Wallace making 10 million a year isn't that bad.
Posted by FromTheGo, Sat Jun-29-13 07:52 AM
The combination of him and Jeff Green should be interesting, but with respect to Rondo's game, what they lose in midrange shooting, they gain in athleticism. Rondo will get them open looks and some easy buckets, and Hump will benefit.

They got 3 draft picks out of swapping bad contracts, and if this draft is any indication of how current GM's evaluate talent, late picks are just as good as early ones.



With the Nets, you can only play 5 at a time, so unless Jason Kidd has some sort of clock management/rotation skill I am not aware of, who is going to rebound???

When you have stacked teams, basketball becomes a chess match.
With Hump and Evans you are guaranteed a solid rebounder at the 4 no matter what rotation especially offensive boards. With KG, you will lose that because he doesn't crash the glass, he hangs outside for that midrange shot. Pierce won't bang inside like Wallace and Brook Lopez is not a rebounding force at all. Humphries and Evans free him up to work on his post up game since they do the dirty work. Their perimeter game improved offensively and adding KG does help scoring in the post, but they lost on D. Joe Johnson ain't defending shit, Pierce ain't defending shit, they will have to keep Evans on the floor as much as possible, but then you really end up playing who has the best matchup.