>"we" is a small contingent within the millions of wrestling
>fans around the world that thinks CM Punk should be pushed
>over The Rock and the WrestleMania main event should have been
>Dolph Ziggler vs. Antonio Cesaro.

Punk should be pushed over Rock. Why? Because The Rock is short term money. Long term money is investing in your next 3-5 years and elevating those players as high as possible instead of giving that time to a has*been.

As far as "we", that's obvious and goes without saying. Having to explain it is strange.

Guess what? We're a bunch of smarks, why on earth are you so incredulous that smarks would actually talk about what they would like to see as opposed to what puts more money in Vince's pockets or who can get the most ceral box covers?

>It's nice that "we" gets their time to shine on the Raw after
>WrestleMania. From what's been said, Vince liked it too.
>Problem is, on this Monday and subsequent Mondays, "we" won't
>attend Raw in those kind of numbers. Truth be told, "we" was a
>minority in that building; they were just loud enough to make
>themselves heard.

And who do you think we are?
Should we alter our tastes and preferences all of a sudden?
You act as though us expressing what we'd like to see happen somehow jeopardizes them in some way.

Hear you tell it, merely expressing the desire to see a Heel Cena has some magic power to make it happen.

>WWE booking their show based on the way "we" want it is
>absurd. As I said in post #353, WWE already has the hardcores.
>They're the ones that will always watch WWE just as they spent
>thousands of dollars coming to WrestleMania and going to all
>of the indy shows over that weekend. WWE is trying to find new
>fans, new viewers, new merch consumers, etc.

>If what "we" wanted worked, ECW would still be in business.
>ROH would make money. Dragon Gate and Chikara would be the
>biggest wrestling companies in the country. But what "we"
>want, doesn't work, so that's why you got spot monkeys that
>almost kill each other in front of crowds that rarely exceed
>500 people. But hey; as long as they continue to do it for
>"we".

SMH. You're so insufferable.

We'd like to see certain shit. We talk about it.

What's the problem with that?

Should change our tastes, preferences, and wants? Should we stop expressing them? Are those expressions causing some sort of harm to the WWE?

Damn dude.

My bad.

I'll stop wanting to see shit the way I want to see it. I didn't realize wanting Dolph Ziggler and Daniel Bryan to have a main event feud is such a detriment to the product in the real world.

lol. cry about it man. We like what we like. Fucking sue us.