>>In fact, you can say Cena was in a bigger position in
>>comparison to Austin. Austin was injured and yet WWE enjoyed
>>some of their biggest ratings. Rock, Jericho, Taker, HHH,
>>Foley, Angle were holding their own while Austin was out.
>>WWE's talent pool and drawing appeal was spread out more
>>evenly at the time.
>
>Psst... that's why they need to start building other people
>instead of giving him the spotlight 24/7.

That's another point entirely, and I've talked about how poor their booking and character development have been several times already. However, you're the one that's constantly defending WWE on here, more than anyone else.

>>However, Cena is #1 in WWE, and #2 is a long shot. So now
>you
>>want to risk WWE hurting their demographics - demos that
>>they've sought to improve and market to with Sat morning tv
>>shows and more kids merch - in order to give internet marks
>>their wet dream? Ok.
>
>No, we want them to present a show we like.

You want to present a show YOU like. There is no "we".

>There's the business conversation, and then there's the
>wrestling conversation. One hand in this climate does not wash
>the other. I say what I want to see because that's what I want
>to see, not because it's influenced by what little kids and
>women like.

No; both convserations go hand-in-hand. They're not mutually exclusive. Wrestling promotions exist to put people in seats. If they don't, they don't stay in business. That's been true for over 100 years.

>Women and children like top 40 hip-pop bullshit, should I stop
>wanting grimey boom bap because it doesn't sell?

No, but to tell those that are making billions of dollars developing a product with that bullshit to stop so they can go out of business making things that you like is stupid and destructive.
_________________________
http://expertise.blogdrive.com
http://twitter.com/KMBReferee
http://www.formspring.me/KMBReferee