>In fact, you can say Cena was in a bigger position in
>comparison to Austin. Austin was injured and yet WWE enjoyed
>some of their biggest ratings. Rock, Jericho, Taker, HHH,
>Foley, Angle were holding their own while Austin was out.
>WWE's talent pool and drawing appeal was spread out more
>evenly at the time.

Psst... that's why they need to start building other people instead of giving him the spotlight 24/7.

>However, Cena is #1 in WWE, and #2 is a long shot. So now you
>want to risk WWE hurting their demographics - demos that
>they've sought to improve and market to with Sat morning tv
>shows and more kids merch - in order to give internet marks
>their wet dream? Ok.

No, we want them to present a show we like.

There's the business conversation, and then there's the wrestling conversation. One hand in this climate does not wash the other. I say what I want to see because that's what I want to see, not because it's influenced by what little kids and women like.

Women and children like top 40 hip-pop bullshit, should I stop wanting grimey boom bap because it doesn't sell?