LOL suggests it's some landslide that isn't even close in favor of Bret. It's actually a reasonable debate, especially when you consider Paul worked in one of the most talent rich eras ever. Now, the matches Bret could have had with the likes of Angle, Guerrero, Benoit, Jericho, and Edge, all in their prime, to say nothing of a rejuvenated HBK, would have been the stuff of legend. Still, this is an actual debate worth having. LOLing at the suggestion is bullshit and further proof you're an old man with antiquated perspective.