2121269, I agree about Rock/Cena. And I'm trying to be optimistic. Posted by Buck, Mon Jan-28-13 05:56 PM
>Rock/Cena? Good for buyrates and nothing else. Cena doesn't >get a rub because he's already the Hogan of this generation. >He's already a mainstream crossover star. He's already >cemented his legacy. There's no rub to be had and everything >about this feud is predictable. It raised buyrates, but what >long term good is done? Not much. Short term, obviously.
No doubt about it. But I'm hoping...
>Here's the problem: He won't be used to legitimize anyone. >He'll be used to put the title back on Cena and nothing more. >The only potential use I see would be with The Shield, but I >doubt that's really in the cards in a significant way.
...that it won't happen that way. But I see your point.
>A rising tide does lift all boats, but the truth is nobody is >being elevated with this and that's a shame. If they really >wanted to make this matter, Ziggler would have cashed in on >Rock last night and we'd have a Rock/Cena/Ziggler Triple >Threat to headline Mania.
Yeah, but I like going back to a Ziggler/Jericho program. There's more good matches to be had there.
|