>exactly bad goal keeping. period. he guessed wrong. that is a
>form of BAD GOAL Keeping. A goalkeeper has to be able to READ
>the action. He failed, and just stood there, aint shit
>trolling about that.

HE DID READ IT. The header was coming in at an angle that dictated that the header go to his right. He had his body prepared to go right and then it went to his left. That was a *great* header precisely because any goalkeeper reading the situation would have gone right. that wasn't proof of shit except that west ham's first goal was a great individual effort.

>my opinion is not trolling, but you not understanding that is.

lol. it's trolling to point at a not great play and call it "shite" goalkeeping. it wasn't shite, it just wasn't amazing.



-----------
It's only funny till someone gets mad. Then it's hilarious.