>>>Cool, RG 3 has almost 600 more total yards.
>>You can't just Cuban B this shit like TDs aren't more
>valuable
>>than yards. I don't even need to make an analogy of this
>>shit. TDs=points. Yards=fantasy football points.
>
>First of all, I wasn't making that argument. I was offering a
>counter-point. I can explain this concept further if you need
>me to.
>
>Second of all, the idea that yards aren't an indicator of
>offensive contribution is a joke.
LOL you're hilarious. I said TDs are MORE valuable. You're trying to dispute that point? Go ahead, I'm waiting...


>BOTH TDs and yards matter. Otherwise goal line backs would get
>paid like franchise backs. Strangely they don't, huh?
We're not talking about running backs, we're talking about Quarterbacks. STOP DEFLECTING.

By the way, Cousins had more yards passing last week than RGIII has had in any game this season. COUSINS BETTER!!

>>
>>
>>>>7th rated passer,
>>>
>>>10 points lower than RG3, who's second only to A.Rodgers
>>>
>>>>wins vs dallas, GB, NE, minny, san
>>>>fran, and chicago.
>>>
>>>Whoopdeedoo.
>>ahhhh so we dismiss that which is a valid argument in favor
>of
>>that which you're not trying to hear
>
>You can only win the games on your schedule. If someone wants
>to show that SEA faced better DEFENSES, go for it.
yes, but wins against quality team ARE pluses. to act like teams aren't judged by the quality of their competition is a delusion.

>But listing off single games as an individual achievement is a
>joke.
when it doesn't benefit your argument.

>>
>>
>>>Russell Wilson is one of the nicest rookies in a while.
>>>
>>>There is no case to be made for him over RG3. None.
>>>
>>oh there's plenty, you just aren't giving any credence to
>>them.
>
>No, there aren't. That's why you admit you'd vote RG3 too.
Actually there ARE. Me saying I'd vote for RG3 doesn't mean others couldn't legitimately vote for Russell as well.

>It's a COMPARISON.
>
>Which means SOME THINGS are in Russ' favor.
>
>When you make a CONCLUSION, however, the choice is obvious.
6 weeks ago, yes. things are not as clear cut as they were before. deny it all you want, but they're not. especially when a backup comes into the game at pivotal moments to close out one game then starts and wins another. it muddies the picture that "it's ALL him" when his replacement succeeds as well.

>I put the basics of a discussion in all caps. If you need help
>with any of them, let me know.


>>
>>look i get it, he's your hopes and dreams, for the first
>time
>>since who knows when, the franchise has a legitimate shot to
>>win every game they play now. and for the record I'd vote
>for
>>RGIII as well, but to act like there's NO WAY Russ should
>get
>>any votes is biased homerism at its finest.
>
>I'd argue that thinking Alex Smith isn't a bust is homerism at
>it's finest, but neither point is relevant.
your angered middle is bleeding red right now to bring up someone's name wholly irrelevant to this post, but bleed on.

>RG3 is rookie of the year.
>
>If he had the 6th rated D instead of the 18th rated D, this
>argument wouldn't even exist.
sure it would, because then you'd be shitting on anyone else to bolster your argument.