>their TS% is almost identically poor, their assist to
>turnover is similar and lin is much better at rebounding and
>steals. felton scoring more is not a good thing whatsoever -
>it just means an inefficient scorer is shooting too much.

>the point: both are average. anyone praising felton while
>criticizing lin is a fucking idiot.
Point 1:
No matter how you slice it, 16 and 6.7 is better than 11 and 6.0
I also love the fact you say much better rebounder, when one is at 4 and the other is at 2.8. He's also MUCH better at steals, from a robust 1.8spg compared to a measly 1.2spg. Why not say that Lin is way more of a dominant shot-blocker as well?
Point 2:
I'm shocked that you didn't bring up 3 point %, which is something you said you swear by. Take more 3's and drive to the rim. Felton's shot very well from 3 while Lin hasn't.
Point 3:
I wasn't one of the people hard on Lin. I said he can be playing better, which he can. But I wasn't bashing him on any stretch