than Lott because he's returned an INTs for touchdowns (as did Lott)...that's a big part of what makes Reed a special player but there is more to the position than just that. It ain't like Reed gets a INT in every game. Can he have as big a impact on a game if he's not making interceptions? Lott could...

Lott was simply better in all other areas. He was 2x better than Reed against the run. Because he was initially a CB he could cover WRs and TEs...and many of his big hits led to fumbles.