Cats used consistency with their arguments.

If cats said they don't like his game...fine
If cats said he should've went to the Bulls...fine

EVEN if cats thought he wasn't a top 10 player, fine. But argue that shit consistently. I'd disagree, but would understand people's POV

But cats start spouting bullshit about dude, saying that anyone from Paul George to Nicolas Batum to (insert SF here) is better...and then cats just jump on the bandwagon. It's funny because I don't take it seriously, but it's also ridiculous. Especially when if someone says that because XYZ, and a Melo fan uses that same logic to apply elsewhere and they're like nah...shit's disgusting

Melo's DAT DUDE and most know it. He needs help and can't win by himself. That's the long and short of it.

And I'm an unapologetic Rondo hater...but at least I can
A. Let people know I'm a hater
B. Put the hate aside and analyze his game from a basketball standpoint.

Some cats can't put the hate away with Melo