>Bean fault?

The Lakers fans on this board were waaaay more critical
of Mike Brown than Pringles, and Pringles was awful

>and how does Charlie's comment or anything related to Mike
>Brown have anything to do w/ Kerr's competency as a coach?

Because he qualified Brown's success with the Cavs, saying
"he gets credit for the defensive side of the ball"

That's the dominant narrative: that their succss was NOT Brown,
but Lebron.

You ever see Popovich's record pre-Duncan?

Look it up.

It's okay for SOME coaches to succeed with a superstar,
but when OTHERS do, then it's all the player.

It's a double standard and I'm not letting up until the
world is free of racist double standards.

Sorry.

Why should Kerr, or anyone else, get entire credit for their
team's success? And especially a team like Golden State, whose
best players consistently praise their former coach?

What is the reason why we should discuss Kerr's success one
way, and Mike Brown's another way?



----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "