>Did Lisa really do the best but they held her resume against
>her? (which of course they're not supposed to do), or did they
>simply edit it to give her more of a chance? Looked like her
>red meat wasn't that great, but they didn't discuss it much at
>all. Meanwhile, the judges made cases for Lisa's other 3
>dishes as the best.

i can see ppl being eliminated based ONE MEAL/challenge. but to name top chef based on one meal is kinda wack. its not like steph cooked a wack meal. but all 3 were prolly good. and steph and lisa were prolly neck and neck, but the tiebreaker will no doubt go to steph.