you popped things off with your comment on the p90ex thing
spare me the third grade comment because you got all juvenile about something you know good and well was merely descriptive language of the appearance of hulk.

>If we're on that, the negatively connotated "Brokeback"
>comment came first, to which I wasn't trying to play "victim"
>(because my name isn't Ang Lee), only pointing out how
>immature it is to call dude 'Brokeback" in a disparaging
>manner, as if him directing that picture was a bad thing in
>any for or fashion.

it wasn't disparaging, only wisecracking,, you simply took offense to that wisecrack and asumed an agenda that wasn't there. it's no different from the way you initially read into the boyz in the hood thread yesterday. you can either accept that i meant no malice or not, but that's your choice.

>Am I allowed to run
>up on white folks or Latinos and spew racial epithets,

smh. did i call you a bunch of names? i called ang lee brokeback because- NEWSFLASH- he directed the movie. i didn't call you brokeback. i didn't insult you.

at worst, it was an insensitive quip of zero consequence on my part.
you've made much more of it then there was. for what it's worth, i apologize because it absolutely wasn't meant to be taken as an ephitet.