>Being that prolific is a hiphop only characteristic.

oh word? because artists in hip hop with that kind of output are just growing on trees? and other artists in other genres don't do it? at all? really?

lol.... this isn't even remotely factual, but ok.


>albums in 15 years is overkill.

well, according to you it's pretty common.

>If The Roots took more time
>and let their albums slowly develop, I think their albums
>would be treated more like hiphop events rather than "another
>Roots album".

there is a valid argument here, except that for the most part... all these albums are quality.