\
>but theres a distinct *ideological* subgroup on the left with
>a specific/rotating cast of characters that routinely
>sabotages elections. its part of their historically
>reinforced identity. the fact that you keep pointing to
>hypothetical ambiguous groups/people and not anyone specific
>on the right is proving my original point.
>




You need to understand the history of electoral politics to grasp this though .


A lot of these cats sound brand new and iont get it