Go back to previous topic
Forum nameGeneral Discussion
Topic subjectYou reached, and reached, and then ran off a cliff
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=13334651&mesg_id=13334756
13334756, You reached, and reached, and then ran off a cliff
Posted by Cold Truth, Fri May-24-19 12:46 PM
>Exhibit A:
>http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=13323081&mesg_id=13323081&listing_type=search#13323377
>There's this gem where you beg a Christian to "witness" to you
>just so you spread your own gospel of non-belief.

The real gem here is your clear mischaracterization of what actually happened. But hey, it's much easier to make a point when you remove all the nuances :)

>Exhibit B:
>http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=13330312&mesg_id=13330312&page=5
>The man just posted an article and you and a host of others
>came in with snark.

He "just posted" a ridiculous article, using a header that made a definitive claim.

People responded with all the reasons why the claim, from premise to conclusion, was riddled with problems.

Your problem is what, exactly?

>Exhibit C:
>http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=13331553&mesg_id=13331553&page=2
>Case made that post for people on a "walk of faith" (which you
>have very LOUDLY admitted that you aren't) but you're there in
>the 2nd reply with snark.

Snark?

I asked very direct, very specific questions that were absolutely in line with the premise of the topic, based on things within the bible that directly contradict the premise.

That you refer to clear, direct, questions using the book upon which that entire religion is based as "snark" is asinine.


>Exhibit D:
>http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=13331687&mesg_id=13331687&listing_type=search#13331843

>You get off on this kind of shit

LMAO are you serious? I "get off" on.... a completely unrealistic hypothetical that amounts to the rough outline of a comedy sketch?

You were reaching before. This is just you flailing at this point.

It's sad, actually.

You posted 4 exhibits that were all pretty poor, and closed with something that doesn't even qualify as bottom of the barrel.

In other words: you got nothing.

>What I've seen lately is Case having online church and you
>showing up to church to say you don't believe when you can
>just walk by the church like all the other sensible people who
>don't wanna attend.

But this isn't church, it's a message board.

He wants private church where he can preach to the converted, he can have private church in a private group on FB or a group text or any number of other options.

But he doesn't. He chooses this forum for it. Which means we're all free to show up.

>We get it. You don't believe... a lot of
>us don't, but you go about it in the most immature way of any
>of us.

Right... by... asking very clear and direct questions regarding the premises, conclusions, and statements he posts.

Your caping is all good. You just don't do a good job of it.