>your energy throughout this whole post is argumentative.


Oh I'm not arguing that at all... ironically lol.


>you could have respected my wishes to not take part (the same way
>I could have ceased communication)


Not arguing that either.
Kind of interesting that you gave me the power to make you "take part" tho.


>you're deflecting/lying to say "there's no
>indication there would be an argument"



Except that's not a lie. I asked you a question. If you had simply answered without your usual flare, I'd have no response, but you're incapable of that... partially due to the retardation that you project on to others. I fully expect more in response. It's how you do.



>retarded is defined as "less advanced in mental or social
>development" than is usual for one's age. I added the
>descriptor high functioning, if that doesnt describe this
>clusterfuck of a post to you, then cool


If your mental and social development was usual for your age, you would know that calling people retarded isn't exactly the right thing to do if you want to have a mature discussion, so how are you surprised that that's not what you get when you do so? This is how "retarded" applies to you, sir.