I followed both men's cases. I have a different perspective

If Safechuck says he was abused everyday at the train station even though it wasn't even built until AFTER the period of alleged abuse happened?

If timelines don't match up, if they both perjued themselves and were found to withholding evidence in the cases, isn't that a reason to question them?

Or Robson was found to be reading up on tabloid stories and sending links to himself from websites specially tailored to paint Jackson as pedophile, perjued himself in his own lawsuit to the point that the judge told him "No rational juror would take his claim seriously".....yeah I'm gonna pause before saying Jackson was guilty.