>RE: I just re-read the transcript of Mueller's speech today...
>
> You cats who are saying that it was empty or hollow or that
>he's a coward seem to be missing the importance of the
>procedural aspect of this stuff. Certain procedural missteps
>can screw up or even nullify an entire investigation.
>
> Mueller has considered his words very carefully. Remember, as
>a part of the DOJ, he can't charge the president. But he's
>laid out the results of his investigation as plainly & clearly
>as he can. It's like Vanna White turning all of the letters
>around on a word but 1.
>
> Now it's up to Congress (because, again, the DOJ can't charge
>45 criminally), specificaly the House, because they have
>impeachment power.
>
> There are still a few investigations going. I get the
>impression that Pelosi wants to wait to see what else comes
>up.
>
> I disagree with the idea that Mueller didn't do his job. I
>think he did it to the best of his ability considering the
>evidence he was able to collect. He set the table, now it's up
>to Congress to serve the meal...when it's ready.

Because all of the above is stuff that we were all already aware of. And the folks who were *not* already aware of all of the above, weren't made anymore aware of all of the above via today's statement.

So what was the point.