13335495, Cool. We already knew all this. So why the fuck did he bother speaking ?
Posted by Brew, Wed May-29-19 10:30 AM
>Even if all the evidence was clearly against Trump, he
>wouldn't be able to indict. It is not constitutional (and it
>would be improper to directly allege a crime took place).
>
>But on the flip side, if Trump could be clearly be cleared of
>crimes, Mueller would flat out say that in the report.
>
>So he's just saying this is a political issue for Congress to
>handle before the Justice system can get involved
|