he doesn't really engage in quality discourse if you disagree with him. Not lately anyway. He disappears, deflects, or dismisses.

I admit my initial response was over the top and not well thought out. I got rightfully called on it by you and others.


But it was in response to several other posts- a culmination of other shit.


You certainly can disagree, but please don't judge based on that response only.



>Establishment ?! "Bubble" !!? C'mon dogg. You've shared
>enough quality discourse w/Reeq to know damn well that's not
>where he's @. In this case, as in most cases, he's trying to
>evaluate the situation objectively and realistically rather
>than idealistically.
>
>I gripe w/a lot of what you said below but I'll let Reeq speak
>for himself. All I'll say is it seems like you're going in for
>no reason, and putting words in his mouth/stating his
>positions (wrongly) for him.
>
>
>>You’re going full establishment lately.
>>
>>That Amazon deal was horse shit. And you are severely
>>over-rating their image. Lol at people “trusting” the
>>institution of Amazon. Especially in a district that’s
>>70-80% Dem. Youre just making up shit.
>>
>>Low turnout in the primary? Lol, when was the last time
>>Crowley even faced a primary? What are you comparing
>>it to?
>>
>>Lol their campaign worked on getting non-voters to
>>vote. Why does that upset the establishment so
>>much?
>>
>>I see you’ve moved the goalpost on her polling
>>too.
>>
>>So do national polls on congress reps matter or not?
>>
>>You keep making claims with no real support, “That’s
>>how you get a pink slip” etc...do you have examples?
>>
>>Reeq, you should take some time off from your bubble. Talk
>>to some non Dems, etc. Youre slipping.
>>
>>Your “I want her to stay, I’m on her side, she should
>just
>>play
>>nice and/orshut up” is some bullshit man.
>>
>>Like I’ve said, the way y’all shit on the base is
>unreal.
>>Then
>>you wonder why the GOPs bass is more loyal.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>