>Then, the backlash over her m4a position. Are people "just
>now" realizing what single payer has meant all this time,
>or..? Lol. I don't get it. Especially since, for those (of us)
>that don't think single payer is a good move for the US and
>believe a public option + tighter regulation might be better
>suited, the lack of private sector cost-sharing is a
>significant reason that some think a single payer system would
>be unsustainable. Is it that she bluntly described in no
>uncertain terms what am entirely government-run system could
>actually mean?
>
>I think folks need to remember universal coverage does not
>have to equal single payer financing. There are other ways.
>Especially considering recent KFF polling that showed strong
>support (74% of respondents) for a public option. I hope m4a
>doesn't become Kamala's/Dems' "border wall".

the backlash is real.
and it should be "the wall" for Dems. that's the ONE thing Kamala has going for her outside of the border wall.

otherwise, I need to hear some real tough talk about the private sector. make it completely non-profit and prohibit any and all denials.

that's something worth "walling up" IMO.

as for the other noise... I'll let y'all sort that out