>https://www.tulsigabbard.org/
>
>Kind of hard to take your inquiry seriously...when the
>information you are asking for is easily found

#1. We can't ask each other on here why they support someone?

#2. I really, sincerely wanted to know why folks were hyped. He was nice enough to actually respond.

#3. I'm bored as shit at work, cut me some slack lol.

>
>My point is...it feels like people are already dividing
>themselves into camps
>
>That's what happened in the last primary
>
>it was Bernie or Bust vs I'm With Her
>
>admittedly, Bernie pushed the platform way further than it was
>intending, IMO
>
>which felt like it forced HRC to come around on a few of those
>issues
>
>I don't want to see that happen again; dividing the party, and
>having to put a gun to someone's head in order to adopt
>progressive ideas
>
>as a voting group, let's decide on the actions that we want
>implemented into policy ahead of the primaries
>
>and as you said, we'll see where those candidates stand and
>what their plan is to get there

I agree and for the record I honestly don't know who I am supporting so I am not representing any camp. I am happy we are having a primary and, on in the case of Tulsi, I think having her in the primary could be a huge positive if it forces other candidates to develop a clear foreign policy. That is one thing I've learned about her recently.


>
>but let's stop pretending a candidate with no blemishes
>exist...

I don't think that. My main point was lets be consistent then. If Tulsi gets props for coming around on gay marriage, then Gillibrand gets props for guns. That was my point.

or in 2019, we can't find information on what their
>campaigns stand for
>
>c'mon

Of course, but if your question is "what has you hyped" I can't google that shit.

"Hey google, what does Jon on Okayplayer like about Tulsi Gabbard?"


Again, I imagine there is going to be a lot of this type of talk around here.