>(but u wont like this, certain character traits that i value
>in a leader are a big part of it for me, and yeah you only
>truly know someone if they're your sister, but we do our
>best)

I get that. Put it this way- folks keep telling me "look how she has grown/evolved!" which is just...its an odd thing to use because typically changing positions is BAD in politics.

Or at least...not the sole reason to like someone lol.


And if growth is the determining factor here, can't Kamala just claim growth on your issues with her?


What about Gillibrand's "growth" on guns?


>
>"I have some unanswered questions, but im very excited (she's
>running).
>
>Moreso than any particular issue, i just have immense respect
>for her overall integrity and case-by-case approach to issues.
>I like that she appears to consider each matter earnestly, and
>not just take whatever side will keep her popular with her
>peers.

Can you give a specific example?

>
>AND i think she would be kryptonite to Trump. She would
>utterly dismantle his fake tough-guy act. She wouldn't even
>have to say anything for everyone to know she's 1000 times
>tougher than him, and she isnt going to pearl-clutch and take
>the bait every one of his stupid tweets and insults, so he
>wont be able to paint her as some kind of wimpy pc-police sjw
>snowflake, which is his main political weapon.
>She'll even call him a little bitch from time to time lol.


This is where I defer to folks who have seen her debate, so I will take your word for it. But in that CNN interview she was talking some generic Hawaii love bullshit.

>
>But she'll actually be focused on the issues and he'll have to
>wade into deeper substantive waters against her."


What specific issues is she going to focus on, though?