And it's why you avoid dealing with the details at every possible turn.

Because I understand very well the arguments and evasive tactic you so consistently employ.

Sorry, you don't get to use special pleading to reach a definition of omnipotence that hinges on internal consistency. You can't resolve a paradox by creating a tautology, and that's exactly what you're doing here.

Again, where you stick to broad, general terms... not only do I point out the inherent flaw with your assertions, I do so with specificity.