but when this is about intentionally misleading "data"

the onus on him to correct it is basically giving a pass to fake newsers

if the foundation of the questions being asked is ignorance and obvious malice...just hold the L and the person presenting the info accountable for being full of shit

as soon as the data is known to be bullshit...continuing to scrutinize data that's easily understood by most to seem fair is rewarding intellectual dishonesty with more of it disguised as critical thinking