Especially when said question is clearly trying to clarify a statement you made.

Summarizing your statements and then asking if that's your actual position is called "communication".

>IF THE THEATER IS FULL!

Oh, so your position is, as always, based on a logical fallacy.

Because if one seat is saved for one member of a family of four, you would be able to find an empty seat and wouldn't have to do what you said you would.

If the theater is full and that's the only seat remaining, someone has snuck in, or the theater somehow managed to oversell.

wWich does happen, admittedly.

Which means that, in such a situation, the question still stands:

Are you saying you're good with pressuring a mother with her two children into giving up her seat for her husband, who has paid for said seat and is merely away getting them snacks, and telling him he has to fight you for that seat?

Is that correct?

Are you able to answer the *actual* question, or are you going to run with the ad hominem as usual?