>which pretty much everyone thinks is stupid that are as
>reasonable as you're trying to be
>

I'll go a step further and say any response (school "hardening", gun control, etc) based on individual incidents like Parkland are not the correct path.
I want gun control measures, but it has nothing to do with the recent school shootings I've seen on the news.

Actions made in reaction to tramuatic events leads to poorly thought out policy.


>but he's using the same data but adding context...stats mean
>nothing without context
>

What context was added? He even recognizes the limits by saying "correlation implied by myself without looking at data".


>so why ignore context? disagree with context with reason just
>like you expect for people to make the conclusions about
>"hardening" schools