>RE: I never labeled you

Hence why I said I'd be happy to discuss it further with you or anyone else.


>but it definitely sounded like you were shocked to hear
>Furhman admit to tainting evidence.

Yes, in reference to that specifically, I said "what the hell are you talking about" because I, again clearly, said in response TO YOU: "I mean I'm not surprised he would do it, I just didn't know ..."


>like it wasn't even a possibility.

Sure OK. If I sounded shocked it was simply because no matter how terrible the person/cop is, it's always shocking to find out that they ADMITTED TO planting evidence. My uncle is a retired racist cop but I wouldn't expect that he'd stoop to that level. If he ever admitted to me that he planted evidence on/framed black people, I'd react with surprise, paired with an element of "...well of course you did."


>Also remember everyone isn't going to read every post when
>addressing you.

Ha - that makes it even more unfair. When people jump to a different thread of responses to join in the "Brew is an awful person" party I'd expect that they'd read every response in that particular string of responses before jumping at the chance to label me.